MANILA, Philippines — The camp of Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) District Engineer Henry Alcantara denied accusations linking him to alleged ghost flood control projects in Bulacan, insisting he had no hand in the supposed scheme.

In a statement issued over the weekend, the Flaminiano Arroyo & Dueñas law firm, which represents Alcantara, said its client “maintains his innocence: he did not author these alleged ghost projects. Any wrongdoing was done behind his back, without his knowledge, acquiescence, or approval.”
The statement directly counters claims that Alcantara was the “kingpin” of the controversial projects, which authorities are now investigating for possible irregularities., This news data comes from:http://cwp.jyxingfa.com
DPWH engineer denies role in Bulacan flood control ‘ghost projects’
“Engr. Alcantara will contest every accusation that he had supposedly participated in and/or benefitted from any unlawful scheme,” the law firm said, adding that he would exhaust all legal remedies, including challenging his summary dismissal from service.
The camp also vowed Alcantara’s cooperation with the ongoing investigation. “He will continue to assist the authorities in the investigation of these flood control ghost projects. We are confident that in due time, the truth will surface and Engr. Alcantara will be cleared of the baseless accusations levied against him,” the statement read.
- House probe tackles flood control corruption: Lawmakers disclose conflicts of interest
- Berlin urges Israel to 'immediately' improve humanitarian conditions in Gaza
- Taiwan, China locked in historical word war
- San Juan commemorates first revolution under Spanish rule in 129th Araw ng Pinaglabanan
- Thailand acting PM moves to dissolve parliament — party
- Modi and Putin affirm special relationship as India faces steep US tariffs over Russian oil imports
- Trump health misinformation swirls despite denial
- Alex Eala targets US Open Round of 32 in rematch against Spanish rival
- 'New' position being offered to Torre — Palace
- SC clarifies rules on land ownership